|
|||
University of
Ottawa John C. Lipscomb PhD, DABT, F.A.T.S. There have been a number of recent developments designed to incorporate increasingly data-informed approaches to consideration of uncertainty in human health risk assessment. Traditional default uncertainty factors of 10 fold each for interspecies (animal to human) differences and intraspecies (human) variability have been parsed into finer constituents, to address toxicokinetic (TK) and toxicodynamic (TD) components as a basis for chemical specific adjustments. An intermediate option between default and chemical specific adjustments, is categorical approaches, which draw on data from multiple chemicals as a basis to make and apply some generalizations. For example, Renwick and colleagues have recently evaluated interspecies differences in the TK of compounds categorized according to the key enzymes in their metabolic pathways. This presentation will discuss two other methods to develop categorical
default values for interspecies extrapolation for inhaled and ingested
substances. For inhaled substances, categorical default factors
are based on measures of tissue exposure at the site of toxic insult – whether
in the respiratory tract or in systemic tissues. For ingested substances,
body weight scaling for interspecies based on allometric relationships
may be used. The application of these factors requires little
data other than knowledge of route of administration and site of action
and they represent one step in the increasingly data-informed continuum
between default and chemical-specific factors. Bette Meek John C. Lipscomp
|
|||
|